Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Woodrow Wilson: Federal Segregation

Woodrow Wilson: Federal Segregation

From the National Postal Museum, "The History and Experience of African Americans: in America’s Postal Service," by Deanna Boyd and Kendra Chen -- During Woodrow Wilson’s 1912 presidential campaign, he promised African Americans advancement. He stated, “Should I become President of the United States, [Negroes] [sic] may count upon me for absolute fair dealing and for everything by which I could assist in advancing the interests of their race in the United States.”(1) Believing in his promise, many African Americans broke their affiliation with the Republican Party and voted for Wilson. He did not, however, fulfill the promises he made during the campaign to the African American community during his presidency. Less than a month after his March 4, 1913 inauguration,(2) President Wilson’s Administration took the first steps towards segregating the federal service.


The question of federal segregation was first discussed in high administration circles at a closed cabinet meeting on April 11, 1913.(3) At the Cabinet meeting Postmaster General Albert S. Burleson argued for segregating the Railway Mail Service. He was disturbed by whites and African Americans working in the Railway Mail Service train cars. The workers shared glasses, towels, and washrooms.(4) He said segregation was in the best interest of the African American employees and in the best interest of the Railway Mail Service.(5) Burleson’s ultimate goal was not only to make the railway lines “lily white”(6) but to segregate all government departments.(7) President Wilson replied to Burleson by saying that he had made “no promises in particular to Negroes [sic], except to do them justice.”(8) He argued that he “wished the matter adjusted in a way to make the least friction”.(9) While President Wilson expressed no direct objections to Burleson’s segregation plans, support came primarily from other cabinet members.


Shortly after the April 11 cabinet meeting, cabinet members Treasury Secretary William G. McAdoo and Postmaster General Albert S. Burleson segregated employees in their departments with no objection from President Wilson.(10) Segregation was quickly implemented at the Post Office Department headquarters in Washington, D.C. Many African American employees were downgraded and even fired. Employees who were downgraded were transferred to the dead letter office, where they did not interact with the public. The few African Americans who remained at the main post offices were put to work behind screens, out of customers’ sight.(11)


The segregation implemented in the Department of Treasury and the Post Office Department involved not only screened-off working spaces, but separate lunchrooms and toilets. Other steps were taken by the Wilson Administration to make obtaining a civil service job more difficult. Primary among these was the requirement, begun in 1914, that all candidates for civil service jobs attach a photograph to their application(12) further allowing for discrimination in the hiring process.


At the same time, the Railway Mail Association, representing the railway mail workers, refused African Americans membership. In response, African American railway mail workers created an organization that is known today as the National Alliance of Postal and Federal Employees Among the efforts that NAPFE is best known for is their protest against the use of photographs for identification in civil service examinations. The Alliance began that protest in 1914, and continued until it was finally eliminated in 1940.

As soon as the Wilson Administration implemented federal segregation individuals and groups began to lobby against the administration’s policy. Congressman John J. Rogers of Massachusetts introduced resolutions urging for the investigations of the treatment of African American employees in the Post Office Department and other Federal Departments. Each one of these measures, however, died on committee calendars.(13) Groups, such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the National Independent Political League also lobbied against segregation. The NAACP led protests, and letter writing campaigns, and gained the support of some whites. In response to NAACP protests Wilson replied that departmental segregation was “in the interest of the Negroes [sic].”(14)


In 1913 a group of African Americans led by the National Independent Political League petitioned the White House. The group met with President Wilson and was assured that “segregation had not been decided upon as an administration policy.(15) After this meeting the group was optimistic. Later that year, however, when a group of white liberals and African American leaders suggested the administration create a National Race Commission to “grapple with the Negro’s [sic] place in an expanding American democracy”(16) they were disappointed when Wilson rejected the plan.

Many individuals concerned with the segregation implemented by the Wilson Administration blamed only Wilson’s cabinet members, primarily Burleson and McAdoo, but not the President himself. They argued that since there was no executive order implementing segregation, Wilson could not have known about, or been in favor of the policy. Wilson was, however, aware of the policy being implemented by members of his cabinet. He, in fact, approved of segregation plans, and vigorously defended the segregation policy in personal letters to NAACP board chairman, Oswald Garrison Villard.

In his letters to Villard, Wilson said that the segregation of the African American employees in the departments was “[not] a movement against the Negroes [sic]”(17) He argued, “We are rendering them more safe in their possession of the office and less likely to be discriminated against”.(18) In other letters to Villard, Wilson said that he favored segregation because it provided African Americans with freedom to advance in their own circle. A practice that curtailed advancement of African Americans in society.(19)


Wilson also revealed his support for segregation in a letter to the editor of the Congregationalist. He stated, “I would say that I do approve of the segregation that is being attempted in several of the departments . . . I certainly would not [have] . . . if I had not thought it to their [Negroes’] [sic] advantage and likely to remove many of the difficulties which have surrounded the appointment and advancement of colored men and women.”(20) [source: National Postal Museum]



5 comments:

  1. Ron, this is fascinating stuff, but I don't see any deconstruction of the facts you've gathered on this blog. What have you learned from all the data?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. {{What have you learned from all the data?}}

      WOW! That's a big question.

      First and foremost, this blog seeks to EDUCATE. Slavery built the nations of the so called "New World," it drove the economic engines of Europe, North America, Africa, South America and the Caribbean Islands. Slavery complicates the American historical narrative -- freedom, justice, liberty, and equality; because slavery represents the antithesis of those themes it gets pushed to the margins and off the pages of history.

      That being said, I have always HATED the way history and especially black history are taught. I'll just highlight my bone of contention with the pedagogy of African American History.

      (1) Black History is taught with biography, like Martin Luther King, Harriet Tubman, Fredrick Douglass, W.E.B. DuBois, Rosa Parks, etc. Why is that a problem? It's disjointed and out of context. Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Movement, for example, rarely if ever, connects with the Cold War and Sputnik. It' s just facile soundbites of "I had a dream..." a couple or rounds of "we Shall Over Come" and a keynote speaker espousing Martin Luther King's "dream." The End. YUCK!

      I'm rambling now. This blog represents my journey as a truth seeker. You're right. I'm on the sidelines and I don't deconstruct these posts. But, there is a backstory behind each and every blog post and photograph. When I explain my blog to family and friends, I'll carefully delineate every selection of authors, scholars, books, images, and sidebars. Perhaps I'm doing the readers of this blog a disservice by not adding my personal analysis; but, there are some thumping good scholars whose voices are muted behind the ivy towers of academe. We live in a time where knowledge is accessible. I can't even begin to fathom a time in human history where the common man has the privilege to draw vast repositories of resources. And as a student of history, we all know that this time will be fleeting, the rich and powerful have ALWAYS kept knowledge away from the common man. They certainly will find a way to sequester these resources that are free and available today, behind firewalls and barriers just as they ALWAYS have.

      So, today we eat from the tree of knowledge. We can view lectures at Ivy League Universities, we can read scholars, we can sit-in on symposiums. It is an amazing time to be alive. But, I don't take this for granted. I have been under constant attack for my content.

      --Ron Edwards, US Slave Blog

      Delete
    2. Except for a few lapses in judgement, such as your inability to see Booker T. Washington's speech for what it was and your excessive admiration of Obama, I would say you are doing a good job. A teacher must have a point of view, otherwise why bother? I think a simple lesson that can be drawn from all this material is that wealth and power have at their base the misery of the greater part of humanity. How about providing some information of Black slavery practiced by the Indians in the U.S south before they were dispossessed and sent West? I'm sorry to hear that you have been under attack for your views. As the first sentence of this comment indicates I disagree with some of your views, I hope you don't include me among your attackers. Keep up the good work.

      Delete
    3. {{ I hope you don't include me among your attackers}}

      Gosh no, I welcome challenging comments. That's good. The overlords of the blogosphere, they whom shall not be named, have been e-mailing me concerning the blog's content. Some have deemed the images, subject matter, and accounts to be "offensive." Now, how do you place a smiley face on oppression and enslavement? It simply can't be done. We've lived for over 200 years of whitewashing and sanitizing history.

      The complexity of history makes it positively fascinating. Like the whole enslavement by certain Indian tribes of African Americans, as you pointed out, complicates the narrative. It wasn't JUST Native American Indians who walked the Trail of Tears, but their SLAVES walked and died along the trail as well. There are a couple of blog posts concerning slave owning Indian Tribes. I haven't posted anything lately, but I have touched upon the subject.

      http://usslave.blogspot.com/2012/03/choctaw-freedmen.html

      http://usslave.blogspot.com/2011/05/removal-of-southeast-native-americans.html

      http://usslave.blogspot.com/2011/09/millions-to-negro-girl-sarah-rector-10.html

      Perhaps I don't draw a bold line, since there were only 5 "civilized tribes" who held slaves, the bulk of the Indian nations were either enslaved, deported, killed or displaced. Here's a couple of discussions on that subject, too:

      http://usslave.blogspot.com/2011/06/chapter-2-first-slaves.html

      http://usslave.blogspot.com/2011/05/bureaucrat-ripped-hole-in-tapestry-of.html

      http://usslave.blogspot.com/2012/04/chapter-1-columbus-indians-and-human.html

      http://usslave.blogspot.com/2011/05/kill-indian-and-save-man-capt-richard-h.html

      http://usslave.blogspot.com/2011/05/indivisible-african-native-american.html

      Thanks for supporting this blog's efforts.

      --Ron Edwards, US Slave Blog

      Delete
  2. VIRUS REMOVAL

    Is Your Computer Sluggish or Plagued With a Virus? – If So you Need Online Tech Repairs
    As a leader in online computer repair, Online Tech Repairs Inc has the experience to deliver professional system optimization and virus removal.Headquartered in Great Neck, New York our certified technicians have been providing online computer repair and virus removal for customers around the world since 2004.
    Our three step system is easy to use; and provides you a safe, unobtrusive, and cost effective alternative to your computer service needs. By using state-of-the-art technology our computer experts can diagnose, and repair your computer system through the internet, no matter where you are.
    Our technician will guide you through the installation of Online Tech Repair Inc secure software. This software allows your dedicated computer expert to see and operate your computer just as if he was in the room with you. That means you don't have to unplug everything and bring it to our shop, or have a stranger tramping through your home.
    From our remote location the Online Tech Repairs.com expert can handle any computer issue you want addressed, like:
    • - System Optimization
    • - How it works Software Installations or Upgrades
    • - How it works Virus Removal
    • - How it works Home Network Set-ups
    Just to name a few.
    If you are unsure of what the problem may be, that is okay. We can run a complete diagnostic on your system and fix the problems we encounter. When we are done our software is removed; leaving you with a safe, secure and properly functioning system. The whole process usually takes less than an hour. You probably couldn't even get your computer to your local repair shop that fast!
    Call us now for a FREE COMPUTER DIAGONISTIC using DISCOUNT CODE (otr214423@gmail.com) on +1-914-613-3786 or chat with us on www.onlinetechrepairs.com.

    ReplyDelete